Metapocalypse now

MorrisonCon program

MorrisonCon program cover. Art by Chris Burnham.

What if Grant Morrison hosted a comic book convention and it changed the world?

That’s exactly what happened nearly two weeks ago at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, although you probably haven’t noticed any difference yet.

But if Grant Morrison is right, you will.

The brainchild of James Sime, Kirsten Baldock and Ron Richards, and curated by Grant (with his wife Kristan), MorrisonCon was designed to tear down traditional comic book conventions (in both senses of the word) and rebuild them from the ground up into an intimate salon experience promoting an exchange of ideas and creative visions about the comics art form. More than 400 people made the pilgrimage to the Nevada desert to attend panels and participate in activities developed by Grant and featuring his nine hand-picked collaborators and co-conspirators: Robert Kirkman (The Walking Dead, Thief of Thieves), Darick Robertson (Transmetropolitan, Happy!), Jason Aaron (Scalped, Avengers vs. X-Men), Jim Lee (X-Men, WildC.A.T.s, Justice League), Gerard Way (The Umbrella Academy), Jonathan Hickman (S.H.I.E.L.D., The Manhattan Projects), Frank Quitely (The Authority, WE3, All-Star Superman), J.H. Williams III (Promethea, Wild Girl, Batwoman) and Chris Burnham (Officer Downe, Batman Inc. ).

The diverse panel discussions addressed comics-related topics such as writing and drawing; connections to music and movies; the worlds of science, metaphysics, magic and myth; Jungian archetypal imagery; and the hastening evolution of human consciousness and technology as we approach the predicted Mayan apocalypse on December 21, 2012.

Expect maximum rock 'n' roll, chaos magic, mind-bending esoterica, sharp suits, surprise guests, and once-in-a-lifetime performances, all wrapped up in the glory that is comics, comics, and more comics.  Grant Morrison

As fascinating and exhilarating as I found all these discussions, they’re not the sort of subjects I usually address on this blog. But even though it wasn’t the topic of a panel, one of my favorite qualities of Grant Morrison’s work is that it has often pushed the boundaries of society’s accepted notions of justice.

I first got hooked on Morrison reading Animal Man, which, besides being an amazingly well-crafted work of metafiction, sought to expose one of the most pervasive and least acknowledged abuses of power in the modern world (as it was in the ancient one): the human exploitation, enslavement, torture and mass killing of the other animals with whom our species shares the planet. The Invisibles was a metaphorical representation of the eternal struggle for individual freedom, self-expression and self-identity against the authoritarian demands for conformity enforced by governments, corporations and religious institutions.

Animal Man #26

Animal Man meets his maker. Words by Grant Morrison, art by Chas Truog and Mark Farmer.

But when Grant left Animal Man in issue 26, donning his first fiction suit to enter the comic book reality he’d created and confront its title character, he explained that his decision was based in part on a feeling that his animal rights story lines had become too “preachy.” By the time Grant’s epic The Invisibles reached its conclusion, the messianic Jack Frost had realized that the battle between freedom and control was a false dichotomy. At MorrisonCon, Grant explained it in Buddhist terms—that we are all as one, both oppressor and victim, villain and hero.

Grant’s decades of work in comics led him to conclude that superheroes are not well-suited for resolving the infinite crises that plague the real world. In his book, Supergods, Grant wrote that “The presumption that superheroes could literally show us how to end hunger or poverty seemed as naive as a belief in fairies.”

I asked Grant during a Q&A session at MorrisonCon if he still felt this way. He replied that he didn’t like to be dogmatic and encouraged creators to express their passion for social causes through their comics. His personal feeling is that pointing fingers at people is one of the surest ways to turn off readers and is never a very effective way of inspiring change. I conceded that his powerful and emotionally riveting WE3 did a much better job than Animal Man of arguing the cause of justice for all beings (in equal part due to the beautiful art of Frank Quitely), even though no one in the story ever mentions the subject of animal rights. (On a related note, I was happy to hear Grant say that he still cares about animal issues and supports animal charities.)

Grant also shared, repeatedly during the weekend, his belief that it is not any one person’s responsibility to save the world. His advice was to just be the best you can be, at whatever path you are called to pursue. Be kind. Be a good friend and neighbor. Be a positive influence on others. Of course, it follows that, if everyone takes this advice, the world will no longer be in need of saving.

That, to me, was the most important and profound message to come out of MorrisonCon. And the most revolutionary.

Justice in our society (and in our comics) has always been retroactive. Someone commits a wrong against someone else, and police and the courts (or superheroes) step in to right it. Unfortunately, that’s inherently impossible. Once the scales are upset, they can never be fully balanced again. Even if the perpetrators of injustice are apprehended and sent to prison, and losses or damages are compensated for, nothing can undo the harm that was done to the victims (unless they can find the inner strength to forgive and move past it on their own).

The only real justice is preemptive. Living a life of tolerance and compassion so that the scales are never unbalanced in the first place.

The Invisibles Omnibus

Weapon of mass deconstruction

And that was the true miracle of MorrisonCon. It turned Las Vegas into the testing ground for a meta bomb (-physical and -fictional) with the potential to send out shock waves that could change the consciousness and conscience of society. The event was a neon hand grenade primed to remake the world in the image of anyone willing to pull the pin—like one of Jonathan Hickman’s Manhattan Projects opening a portal to J.H. Williams III’s Immateria. Based on most of the comments my fellow attendees have been tweeting since then, the explosion of creativity, good will and camaraderie generated that weekend has already changed the worlds of the 400-plus people who were caught in the blast.

And now we have scattered from the Nevada desert to the far reaches of the globe, rippling outward in a chain reaction that will continue touching other lives—through art, personal relationships and activism—triggering more explosions until a critical mass is reached that can rewrite the story of our collective future.

And eventually the whole world will be changed, the only way it ever has been—one heart and mind at a time.

My road to MorrisonCon

1990: Working as a correspondent at PETA when Grant finishes his run on Animal Man, I write and send him (via DC Comics) a letter from the organization officially commending his animal advocacy (and exceptional storytelling). I don’t know if it was ever forwarded to him.

1996: After reading Flex Mentallo, I write my second letter to Grant (via Vertigo Comics), this time thanking him for rewriting a happy ending to a personal tragedy in my life. Again, I don’t know if he ever received the letter.

1999: Working with DC Comics as the Director of the Doris Day Animal Foundation’s Comics for Compassion program, I try unsuccessfully to get Grant, who is writing JLA at the time, to write our educational comic book, Superman for the Animals. (The assignment is instead given to Mark Millar.)

2002: Consulting with Marvel Comics on my second Comics for Compassion project, I make another unsuccessful attempt to get Grant, who at this point is working on New X-Men, to write the story that will eventually be published in X-Men Unlimited #44. (In the end, the Genesis Award-winning story, ”Can They Suffer?”, is written by Chuck Austen.)

2005: In April I give a PowerPoint presentation, “Images of Liberation: Comics, Cartoons, and Graphics,” which focuses heavily on Animal Man and WE3, at the Grassroots Animal Rights Conference in New York City. An excerpt from that presentation is the basis for my article published the following month in Satya magazine, “United Animal Kingdom: Grant Morrison’s All-Species Comics.”

2007: I meet Grant for the first time in NYC after he appears on a panel discussing superheroes as part of that year’s New Yorker Festival. He signs my first issues of Animal Man, The Invisibles and WE3 and I give him a printed copy of my 2005 PowerPoint presentation (and, I think, a copy of the letter I sent him while working for PETA).

2010: Our house is broken into and, along with more traditionally stolen items, the thief takes several of my Grant Morrison comics, including the three Grant signed for me. (Several months earlier, almost my entire run of The Invisibles—excluding issue #1—was destroyed in a basement flood that claimed hundreds of my comic books.)

Me and Grant Morrison2012: Trying to find a way to replace my Grant-signed comics, my wife Vicki stumbles on MorrisonCon, which I somehow have not heard of, and buys me a ticket as a 50th birthday present. During my encounters with Grant at MorrisonCon, I get several items signed, have my picture taken with him, and finally get to thank him in person (as well as Frank Quitely) for Flex Mentallo.

Posted in Activism, Events, Personal heroism, Superheroes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Dynamic Duo (Part 2)

Jack Kirby, known as the “King of Comics,” brings a visual dynamic to the duo of iconic figures I’m celebrating for their influence on my life. Kirby, who would have been 95 today, is one of the founding fathers of the comics industry and one of the art form’s greatest masters. He defined the graphic vocabulary of depicting superhero action, was instrumental in building the world’s biggest comics publishing empire, and his seemingly limitless imagination introduced generations of readers to countless worlds of awe-inspiring visual majesty and wonder. Unfortunately, unlike social justice icon Howard Zinn, I never got to meet Kirby, but his lifelong passion for graphic storytelling was crucial in kindling my own.

The Cosmic King
The man who would be King was born Jacob Kurtzberg on August 28, 1917, in Manhattan’s Lower East Side. His parents were Austrian Jewish immigrants, and his father earned a living as a garment factory worker. The young Kirby drew as a way of escaping from the impoverished conditions of his neighborhood (he sometimes used the hallway walls of the tenement building his family lived in as a sketch pad). Essentially self-taught, in late 1939 he began working for the movie animation company Fleischer Studios, and then, as the Golden Age of comic books took off, he began writing and drawing for the comic-book packager, Eisner & Iger Studio. Working in all comic book genres under a variety of pseudonyms, in 1942 he legally changed his name to Jack Kirby because it reminded him of actor James Cagney (and not, as some people claimed, to hide his Jewish heritage). This was the same year that Kirby married Rosalind Goldstein, with whom he would eventually raise four children (another coincidental similarity between Kirby and fellow New Yorker and son of Jewish immigrants Howard Zinn, was that both men married women who went by the name “Roz”).

One of Kirby’s earliest and most famous contributions to comics history was creating Captain America in 1941, with partner Joe Simon, for the company that would one day be known as Marvel Comics. Simon and Kirby soon moved to DC Comics, where they produced the kid gang comics Boy Commandos and Newsboy Legion and eventually went on to create the romance comic genre.  In 1958, Kirby (without Simon) returned to Marvel Comics, where he drew everything from westerns to giant monster stories (which were one of my early childhood favorites). Then, starting in 1961, Kirby and Marvel editor Stan Lee began a nearly 10-year creative collaboration that is widely regarded as the most significant and successful in comics history. During this period, Kirby co-created characters and groups including the Fantastic FourThor, the Hulk, Iron Man, the X-Men, the Avengers, the Black Panther, the Silver Surfer and Nick Fury (in his roles as both leader of the Howling Commandos and as a later agent of S.H.I.E.L.D.). But despite Kirby’s contributions to the success of Marvel Comics, which became known as “The House That Jack Built,” he left the company for the second time in 1970 to work again for DC Comics, due to disputes over creative control, credit, compensation and ownership of his original artwork.

This is where I come in. At eight years old, 1971 was my first full year as a comic book reader, so my first exposure to Kirby was the amazing array of comics he began writing and drawing for DC at the time. These included his epic Fourth World saga, which chronicled the conflict between the super-powered celestial beings of New Genesis and the demonic denizens of Apokolips, led by the evil Darkseid. Consisting of New Gods, The Forever People and Mister Miracle, these titles were Kirby’s attempt to create a modern mythology that would present primordial archetypes with superhero style.

Over the next year, Kirby also introduced readers to a centuries-old Arthurian demon doing battle in the present with equally ancient witches and warlocks; the last boy on a post-apocalyptic earth ruled by mutated anthropomorphic animals; a meek everyman in a soul-numbing future utopia transformed into a One Man Army Corps by a sentient satellite; and a superheroic master of Dreams protecting sleeping children from marauding nightmares. This was unfettered Kirby unleashing the full force of his imagination on impressionable young eyes and minds like mine in images so full of energy that they could barely be contained on the page.

Despite this outpouring of ideas at DC, in 1975 Stan Lee coaxed Kirby back to Marvel. In addition to working on his superhero creations Captain America and Black Panther, Kirby explored more cosmic concepts in series based on 2001: A Space Odyssey, ancient astronaut theories, and anachronistic prehistory.  But perhaps predictably, after just three years, Kirby’s continued dissatisfaction with Marvel’s treatment of him, including the company’s refusal to provide health and other employment benefits, caused him to leave the publishing house that he built for the third and last time (See the Comics Reporter for an impressive sampling of Kirby’s art throughout his career).

cinema a la kirbySince Kirby’s death in 1994, DC and Marvel have continued to profit from the characters and worlds he created. Although neither of the two comic book publishing giants ever gave Kirby the compensation he deserved, his mistreatment by Marvel, which I described in a previous post, is legendary. Adding insult to injury, over the past 12 years, movies based on characters and stories Kirby created with Stan Lee have grossed $6.5 billion worldwide. Marvel and its parent company, Disney Studios, have fought Kirby’s heirs in court to prevent them from receiving one cent of that money and, perhaps worse, to deny their father’s contributions to the original works that generated all this wealth.

One of the biggest disappointments over Marvel/Disney’s actions for me as a comic book fan, and the greatest betrayal to Kirby and his family, has been the credit his longtime collaborator Stan Lee has taken as the primary architect of the Marvel Universe. Immediately after the big bang that started it all in 1961, and during the years of expansion that followed, Lee was explicit about Kirby’s role in Marvel’s success. In a 1968 interview, Lee admitted:

Some artists, such as Jack Kirby, need no plot at all. I mean I’ll just say to Jack, “Let’s let the next villain be Doctor Doom” . . . or I may not even say that. He may tell me. And then he goes home and does it. He’s so good at plots, I’m sure he’s a thousand times better than I. He just about makes up the plots for these stories. All I do is a little editing . . . I may tell him that he’s gone too far in one direction or another. Of course, occasionally I’ll give him a plot, but we’re practically both the writers on the things.

But when he testified on Marvel’s behalf during the copyright lawsuit, which the Kirby heirs lost, he made it seem like he was the captain directing every element of story production:

STAN LEE: Well, it was my job to dream up new characters or to continue with the characters we had and to pick the best artists and the best writers unless I wrote something my — I had the privilege, which now that I think back, it was rare, but I could either write stories myself or I could hire writers. I couldn’t write everything. And it was my job to hire the artists to draw the stories. And I did that for quite a number of years.
Q. And did you give instructions to the artists as to how you wanted the story to go?
STAN LEE: Oh, yes. That was my job as Art Director.
Q. So in addition to writing, you were also the Art Director?
STAN LEE: Yes.

More shocking to me were statements Lee made during an interview this year to promote both The Avengers and an autobiographical documentary released by Lee’s own production company. After expressing confusion as to why Kirby’s name should appear in the movie credits for The Avengers,  Lee tried to pass the buck, saying that (despite his status as Editor Emeritus of Marvel Comics and Executive Producer on every Marvel Studios film) he had nothing to do with deciding who got credits in the movie. Then he complained that he thought he was going to be asked about his documentary, ironically titled, With Great Power: The Stan Lee Story.

This title is taken from Lee’s most quoted line as a comic book writer (from the 1962 first appearance of Spider-Man), “with great power there must also come — great responsibility.” Lee enjoys the adoration of millions of comics fans, international fame as a pop cultural icon, and millions of dollars on Disney’s payroll. It’s understandable that he wouldn’t want to risk losing all that by speaking out against the House of the Mouse in Kirby’s defense. But Lee would have none of those things in the first place if not for Jack Kirby. Lee is the only person who can set the record straight about Kirby’s co-authorship of the Marvel Universe and help his heirs get at least some fraction of the recognition and compensation that the King never got during his earthly reign. I just hope that Lee finds the power to live up to that responsibility, before it’s too late.

Posted in Creators' rights, History, Superheroes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Dynamic Duo (Part 1)

Starting today, I am celebrating the birthdays of two iconic figures who are among the most well-known and loved men in their respective fieldssocial justice and comic art storytelling. Even though these two sons of working class Jewish immigrants were born only five years and about six miles apart in early 20th century New York City, to my knowledge they never met or even had any awareness of each others’ existence. In contrast, not only was I aware of both of them (and eventually met and frequently corresponded with one of them), but they have been instrumental in shaping the two great passions of my life. That makes them largely responsible for the existence of this blog, which makes it fitting that I remember them as the superheroes they were, and are, to me.

Professor Z
Howard Zinn was born on August 24, 1922, in Brooklyn, where he grew up during the Great Depression. Both his immigrant parents were factory workers with limited education when they met and married, and there were no books or magazines in the series of apartments where they raised their children. Zinn’s love of reading started when he picked up a discarded copy of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan and the Jewels of Opar that someone had tossed in the street. His parents further encouraged his interest in literature by sending 10 cents plus a coupon to the New York Post for each of the 20 volumes of Charles Dickens’ collected works (which provided his first introduction to the long history of class struggle). He also studied creative writing in a special program at Thomas Jefferson High School.

At 18 he became a shipyard worker and then flew bomber missions during World War II. These experiences helped shape his opposition to war and passion for history. In 1944 he married Roslyn Shechter, with whom he would raise two children. After attending college under the GI Bill and earning a Ph.D. in history from Columbia, he taught at Spelman College, where he became active in the civil rights movement (one of his students, Alice Walker, would go on to win a Pulitzer Prize for her novel, The Color Purple). After being fired by Spelman for his support for student protesters, Zinn became a professor of Political Science at Boston University, where he taught until his retirement, as a Professor Emeritus, in 1988 (his young neighbors in Boston, Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, became Zinn’s lifelong admirers).

I first became aware of Howard Zinn in 1990, when an anarchist coworker introduced me to his most famous book, A People’s History of the United States, which has sold more than two million copies since it was first published in 1980, and been featured on The Sopranos and The Simpsons, and in the film Good Will Hunting (written by and starring his since grown protégés, Matt and Ben). Reading that book gave me a new appreciation for U.S. history, which at a mere 200-plus years, I had always considered too short to be of much interest. It also demonstrated to me that “history isn’t what happened, but a story of what happened,” and that with very few exceptions, the story of our nation’s history has been told by rich, white men of privilege. A Peoples’ History (along with the several others of Zinn’s more than 20 books I later read) taught me that the great leaders of history, usually credited with directing our country’s sometimes agonizingly slow journey toward the pledged goal of “liberty and justice for all,” seldom really led so much as they were dragged—sometimes kicking and screaming—toward it by outraged masses of common people. The most valuable lesson I learned from Professor Zinn was that true patriotism requires an honest examination, and sometimes criticism of those leaders’ past actions and motivations, because if you believe your country has done no wrong, it’s easy to believe it can do no wrong—which inevitably results in it committing truly terribly wrongs.

I met Howard Zinn for the first time at a 1995 book signing at Politics & Prose in Washington, D.C., which coincided with the release of a revised and updated edition of A Peoples’ History. Shortly after that meeting I began corresponding with him, eventually sending him my proposal for an as-yet-unrealized book on the history of social justice issues portrayed in superhero comic books.

Me and Howard Zinn at Politics & Prose in 1995Howard wrote to me that, although he had been a fan of pulp magazine heroes such as Doc Savage (also one of my favorites), he “never followed the superheroes in comics, though of course I was aware of Superman and Batman and the others.” (He was about 16 when the Golden Age of Comics started in 1938, which was probably just old enough to avoid getting caught up in the comic book craze that was enthralling young readers across the nation.)

Despite his lack of personal experience with comic books, he appreciated their potential for conveying important ideas. He wrote this endorsement for Joel Andreas’ 1991 graphic exposé, Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can’t Kick Militarism:

“Addicted to War is a witty and devastating portrait of U.S. military policy, a fine example of art serving society.”

One of the proudest moments of my life was reading the endorsement Howard emailed me for my own work: “I think your book proposal is ingenious, unique, important — could be a real contribution to our cultural history.”

Of my opinion that superheroes should be champions of social justice, Howard said:

Sure the dogmatic view of the socially conscious superhero would say: aha, more dependence on individual saviors — not really democratic. On the other hand, kids need heroes, and better an anti-war, anti-Establishment hero — as a transition to a more sophisticated view of [how] social change occurs.

Although comic books had never much influenced Howard, his work did eventually have an influence on comic books. It was a major source of inspiration and information for  Uncle Sam, a two-issue miniseries by writer Steve Darnall and artist Alex Ross, originally published in 1998 by DC Comics’ Vertigo imprint. In it, a homeless man dressed as the title character stumbles through an unnamed American city struggling to remember who he is, while experiencing vivid flashbacks of being present at various moments throughout our nation’s past.

In the second issue, a triptych shows three historic scenes of government violence witnessed by Uncle Sam: Shays’ Rebellion, the Haymarket massacre and the Kent State shootings. Due to my own education from Professor Zinn, I noticed the middle panel mistakenly indicated that the Haymarket incident took place in 1893, rather than the correct year of 1886. I had met Steve Darnall prior to Uncle Sam‘s release at the Small Press Expo I attend every year, so I emailed him to let him know about the error. The date was corrected in the hardback edition collecting the original two issues that came out the following year. Later, I arranged for Steve and Alex to send an autographed copy of the hardback Uncle Sam to Howard.

Panels from Uncle Sam by Steve Darnall and Alex Ross

A People's History of American EmpireI had once suggested to Howard that a graphic adaptation of A People’s History would be a great way to reach a whole new audience of readers. I don’t know if he remembered my suggestion or not, but in 2008 that graphic adaptation became a reality. Actually,  A People’s History of American Empire adapts both the original A People’s History and Howard’s 2002 autobiography, You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train (which was later made into an award-winning documentary narrated by Matt Damon). Edited by Paul Bruhle, scripted by Dave Wagner and illustrated by Mike Konopacki, Empire primarily focuses on the history of U.S. military expansionism, but also shares  important incidents in U.S. labor history, such as the 1894 Pullman Strike involving 250,000 railway workers across the country and the 1914 Ludlow Massacre, in which Colorado National Guardsmen opened fire on a tent-colony of 1,200 striking coal miners, killing 19 men, women, and children.

Here’s an eight and a half minute video preview of the book, narrated by Viggo Mortensen.

Jasper Meets Howard Zinn

2010 cartoon by Angelo Lopez featuring Howard Zinn. (Click to enlarge.)

Sadly, Howard Zinn died on January 27, 2010 (he would have been 90 years old today).  Despite this, his presence continues to be felt in the world of comic art, thanks to the works of cartoonists who were among his unofficial students. He was eulogized shortly after his death by Keith Knight, creator of the syndicated newspaper strip, The K Chronicles. Nearly a year later, Howard payed a visit from beyond the grave to political cartoonist Angelo Lopez‘s character, Jasper the Cat, to lift his spirits about the possibilities for meaningful social change and to remind him that President Barack Obama, like all politicians throughout history, must be held accountable to the people (be sure to visit Angelo’s Web site for the second page of this cartoon).

Although the world is greatly diminished by the absence of Howard Zinn from it, I take comfort in knowing that the many people inspired by his work and educated by his writing continue to carry on his struggle for social justice.

Tuesday I will share a post commemorating Jack Kirby, the other half of my Dynamic Duo.

Following that, I will continue my Comic Book Justice series (which is based on the proposal I sent Howard).

 

Posted in Activism, History, Non Fiction, Personal heroism, War | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Comic Book Justice (Part 5)

Even as a new era of American prosperity began after WWII, the cloud of radioactive ashes drifting outward from Hiroshima and Nagasaki spread a nuclear winter across the globe that froze any hope for a lasting post-war peace dead in its tracks. As communism replaced fascism as America’s ideological opposite, bringing with it the chilling and ever-present threat of atomic annihilation, people huddled together for the warm feeling of security that comes from familiarity and conformity. But that feeling quickly vanished when the whole country soon found itself shivering under the icy stare of the Cold War’s self-proclaimed commander-in-chief.

The big chill
Senator Joe McCarthy and his Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations spread paranoia like frostbite, convincing the American people that the only way to save their way of life was to cut off parts of themselves: chiefly their civil liberties and fellow citizens. Any deviation from the accepted norms of behavior was seen as evidence of communist subversion and a threat to all of society. Although McCarthy and his cronies were able to ruin hundreds of lives in a matter of just a few years,  the senator finally went too far in 1954 when he attacked the U.S. Army. But just as McCarthy was losing both his credibility and his hold over the nation, a troubled doctor was enlisting the aid of another U.S. senator in an attempt to purge the comics industry of its own unwholesome elements.

Dr. Fredric Wertham

Dr. Fredric Wertham gets to know his enemy.

Author of the anti-comic book diatribe, Seduction of the Innocent, child psychiatrist Fredric Wertham had concluded that because most of the juvenile delinquents he treated in his Harlem clinic read comic books, comic books must be a primary cause of juvenile delinquency. This herculean leap of “logic” conveniently overlooked that nearly every well-adjusted boy and girl in America read comic books too. In 1948, a series of incendiary distortions by Wertham and others published in the popular press led to comic book burnings from coast to coast. Having seemingly forgotten America’s recent triumph over Naziism, communities began reenacting the Third Reich’s crimes against free expression by gathering up and incinerating the works of “deviant” comic book writers and artists they deemed unfit for public consumption.

Comic book burning

Young Americans emulating Hitler Youth at a comic book burning party. Binghamton, New York, 1948.

But such acts of vigilante fascism weren’t good enough for Wertham and his supporters, who would be satisfied with nothing less than having comic book decency enforced by law. Wertham found a willing ally in Senator Estes Kefauver, co-chair of the 1954 Senate Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency. Wertham testified before the subcommittee as an expert witness, and the allegations he and Kefauver made about the corrupting influence of comics were latched onto by the media, which dramatized these charges with all the hysterical inaccuracy that films like Reefer Madness used to depict the effects of marijuana. In a 1955 episode of the televison news exposé program, Confidential File, host Paul Coates implied that prolonged exposure to horror and crime comic books turns impressionable boys into serial killers (the part of this dramatization I find most horrifying is graphic footage of comic books rolled up in back pockets and tossed on the ground outside). This disturbing program later inspired the title of Ron Mann’s 1988  pro-comic book documentary, Comic Book Confidential, which includes a scene from Confidential File (you can watch the entire 25-minute episode here).

 

Captain Marvel Adventures #140

Korean War-era comic book featuring a story about "Mongol blood drinkers." Cover dated January 1953.

Wertham and Kefauver also aimed most of their criticism at crime and horror comics, which did contain unsettling excesses of violence and were being marketed to kids. Like many real people at the time, comic book superheroes tried to protect themselves from being blacklisted by loudly proclaiming their patriotism. The Korean War gave the few superhero veterans who survived WWII the chance to prove themselves loyal Americans. They waged a full-scale assault against Soviet agents and Red Chinese soldiers who were rendered with the same sort of Mongol horde imagery that had demonized the Japanese during WWII. But readers no longer saw superheroics as a reasonable or even entertaining response to the alleged communist threat, and superhero comics were quickly crowded off newstand shelves by titles featuring G-Men and other federal agents battling against the Iron Curtain.

The only exceptions were Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman, whose comic books continued to be published throughout this bleak period. This trio had maintained their popularity precisely because of their wholesome, all-American demeanor and their avoidance of sensitive subjects. But that didn’t save them from  Dr. Wertham, who claimed, “They arouse in children phantasies [sic] of sadistic joy in seeing other people punished over and over again while you yourself remain immune. We have called it the Superman complex.” And that was only the tip of the iceberg.

hidden images

Dr. Wertham spotted a subliminal depiction of female genitalia insidiously hidden in this man's shoulder muscles.

Demonstrating an imagination even more vivid than that of the children he was trying to protect, Wertham saw sexual imagery in almost every comic book panel. But the good doctor’s most damning diagnosis was given to superheroes whose sexuality he thought was directed toward their own gender. Wertham proclaimed that Batman and Robin represented “a wish dream of two homosexuals living together” and that their “Lesbian counterpart,” Wonder Woman, was someone who “tortures men, has her own female following, [and] is the cruel, ‘phallic’ woman.” These charges were no doubt taken very seriously by parents who probably found the prospect of their kids turning out to be sissies or tomboys just as frightening as the idea of their becoming juvenile delinquents and mass murderers.

Unwilling to wait for the temporary insanity behind such accusations to subside on its own (which it soon did), in November of 1954, publishers formed the Comics Magazine Association of America (CMAA) in an attempt to quell the Senate’s anti-comic book inquisition. The CMAA immediately drafted the Standards of the Comics Code Authority (CCA), which placed far greater restrictions on free speech than Congress ever could—without repealing the First Amendment.

CCA seal of approvalFor a comic book to receive the CCA seal of approval on its cover—without which no retailer would sell it—the story inside had to adhere  to the organization’s rigid list of guidelines. Primarily concerned with curtailing depictions of crime, violence, sex and the supernatural, the CCA also sought to wipe out civil unrest through its General Standards Part A: #3, which insisted that “Policemen, judges, government officials, and respected institutions shall never be presented in such a way as to create disrespect for established authority.” The lone maverick to challenge the acceptance of the status quo and expose the ugly truths behind the American dream was non-superhero publisher EC Comics, which was soon all but silenced by the severe restrictions placed on it by the CCA. This guaranteed that young readers would never be exposed to any dissenting opinion’s about the wisdom and justness of those who decided what rights they and their parents were entitled to and how and when they could exercise them.

When DC Comics began a superhero revival in 1956, heralding what would come to be known as the “Silver Age” of comics, this formula for success was repeated by a whole new generation of costumed crime-fighters. This ensured that any superhero role model readers might encounter in the pages of a comic book would be an unquestioning supporter of whatever government policy—from segregation to the draft—was in effect at that moment.  But as the next decade unfolded, the attitudes of society, including comic book readers, quickly began to change, and the Comics Code Authority eventually had to change with them.

Next, Part 6: Super power to the people.

Note: For an excellent in-depth account of the Senate hearings, the creation and enforcement of the Comics Code, and the history of government attempts to censor comic books, read  The Ten Cent Plague by David Hajdu.

Posted in Activism, History, Superheroes, War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Comic Book Justice (Part 4)

While Superman and several of his costumed comic book peers had begun their careers as champions of the downtrodden, their focus changed with the advent of World War II. Soon, superheroes were racing each other to jump aboard the jingoistic bandwagon and demand the total destruction of America’s enemies overseas. There was little room left for any character still trying to point out problems on the home front. But even though most comic book writers and artists of this period were producing a seemingly endless supply of pro-war adventures, some of them—whether intentionally or not—created comics that exposed the horrors and injustice of war hidden beneath pageantry and propaganda.

Superman #18, 1942

Superman goes from dove to hawk (1942).

All that glitters
December 7, 1941, may have been a “day of infamy,” but it also ushered in a “Golden Age” of opportunity for superheroes. That is the name comic book historians have given to the industry’s formative years when a host of costumed characters was unleashed on young readers eager to share the excitement of the times. Before America’s entry into WWII, Superman had stopped two fictional wars on humanitarian grounds, due to the massive death and suffering all armed conflicts inevitably cause. But once America joined the Allied Forces, he became a poster child for the U.S. war effort (mostly on comic book covers—the stories inside rarely addressed the war, which Superman had already twice demonstrated he would have been able to end in a day).

 Superman painted on B-17 bomber

Reflecting the nation’s sense of outrage in the aftermath of the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, grotesque caricatures of the Japanese replaced corrupt Americans as the villain of choice (German Nazis, although usually portrayed as buffoonish or sometimes monstrous, were generally not depicted with the same type of racist imagery). Meeting the “yellow hordes” head on, legions of Golden Age superheroes brutally dispatched the enemy in droves.

Laying waste to the the enemy

No sympathy for the "yellow devils."

Captain America #1

Captain America #1. Cover art by Jack Kirby. Copyright Marvel Comics.

Sometimes almost literally draped in the flag, a host of super patriots—including the Fighting Yank, Minute Man, Major Victory, the Spirit of ‘76, and even Uncle Sam himself—gleefully leapt into the fray. The most famous of these star-spangled heroes is Captain America. Almost a full year before the United States went to war against Germany, this “Sentinel of Liberty” showed up on the cover of his first comic book socking Hitler in the jaw. But the political daring of Jewish creators Joe Simon and legendary artist Jack “King” Kirby ended with this first strike against Aryan tyranny. Happy to attack the Nazi Party’s evil agenda, even while our own government at the time was still indifferent to it, neither Captain America nor any of his peers so much as questioned such U.S. “Reich-like” practices as the racial segregation in the military, the turning away of Jewish refugees, the unconstitutional imprisonment of 6,000 conscientious objectors and internment 110,000 Japanese-Americans, or the incineration of an estimated 150,000-250,000 men, women, and children in the twin atomic holocausts at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Bombshell

Bombshell wages peace. From Boy Comics #3, 1942.

Even though no superhero at the time dared to speak out against these acts, some did add a plea for restraint to the comic book crusaders praising the glories of war. Apparently worried that they might be taken as wimps, writers often gave these less belligerent superheroes extremely combative names. Bombshell—a product of publisher Lev Gleason—was charged with a mission of peace (oddly enough) by his father Mars, the Roman god of war. Bombshell was equipped with a magic sword that was incapable of drawing blood, but could slice through Panzers, U-boats, and Stukas as if they were made of tin foil. Other anti-war superheroes included Centaur Publications‘  paradoxically named Man of War (also a creation of the god Mars), and the android, Manowar (sometimes known as White Streak), published by Funnies Inc. Manowar/White Streak described himself as ”a keeper of peace, breaker of war mongers who fight for profit with men’s lives as pawns.”  Despite their noble ideals, these comparative pacifists (who had nothing against using their fists in pursuit of world peace) were quickly overshadowed by their more bloodthirsty peers and soon faded into obscurity. But their cause was not lost.

The Justice Society of America (JSA) was the world’s first superhero team. When it debuted on the cover of All Star Comics #3 in the winter of 1940, the JSA’s original roster included the Atom, Doctor Fate, the Flash, Green Lantern, Hawkman, Hourman, the Sandman and the Spectre. While promoting the Allied effort as earnestly as any, the JSA often pointed out the tragic nature of WWII through stories that focused on war orphans (issue #7, 1941) the starving masses of occupied Europe (issue #14, 1942), or disabled veterans (issue #27, 1945).

The JSA in All-Star Comics

The Justice Society of America draws attention to the true cost of war.

Godless Pledge of Allegiance

A Godless Pledge of Allegiance. From All-Star Comics #22, 1944.

In All-Star Comics #16 (1943), the members of the Justice Society of America—which by then included Wonder Woman, Doctor Mid-Nite and Starman—campaigned to denounce racism, religious intolerance and classism as tools exploited by the Nazi’s to divide a united America. In All-Star Comics #22 (1944), they encouraged citizens young and old to embrace tolerance and understanding as the defining characteristics of our nation. The last page of this story serves as an interesting historical and cultural artifact. It shows the JSA leading an auditorium full of children in a Pledge of Allegiance that is missing the phrase “under God,” which wasn’t added until 1954 (proving that, if the Greatest Generation’s godless allegiance to their country was good enough to defeat the Axis Powers, it should be good enough for today’s Americans).

Junior JSA membership certificate

The super group encouraged young people to practice what the JSA preached with a radical pledge of its own that was included in the membership application sent to readers who paid 25¢ to join the Junior Justice Society of America. Stressing the JSA’s idea of a just society, this 1942 document asked young members to promise:

“. . . to help keep our country united in the face of enemy attempts to make us think we Americans are all different because we are rich or poor, employer or worker, White or Negro, native or foreign born, Gentile or Jew, Protestant or Catholic. . .”

Unfortunately, these high ideals were short-lived. World War II ended with two atomic bangs that sounded the death knell for superheroes who questioned the status quo. In fact, by the time the mushroom clouds of V-J Day had cleared, the stampede of comics’ initial superhero gold rush was already losing steam. Peacetime publishers were turning instead to humor, romance, western, horror, and true crime comics as principle sources of profit. They had no way of knowing that the enemy the JSA had warned of would soon strike from within our own borders.

Next, Part 5: The big chill.

Posted in Activism, History, Superheroes, War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Comic Book Justice (Part 3)

In this part of my history of comic book superheroes I look at the very first superhero, after whom all those who followed him are named. No one had ever seen anything like him—but it wasn’t just his powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men that stood him apart from pulp magazine predecessors like Doc Savage and The Shadow. While he represented a fantastical new breed of fictional character, his sense of priorities was very much a product of the real world in which he first came into being.

Siegel and Shuster

Superman creators Jerry Siegel (standing) and Joe Shuster.

Faster then a speeding ballot
The Depression put an end to Horatio Alger optimism that promised success and riches to any man willing to work hard enough for them (women were pretty much left out of this implied social contract). It was during this time that a pair of young Jewish men living in Cleveland, Ohio—writer Jerry Siegel and artist Joe Shuster—created the perfect heir to follow in the footsteps of literature’s justice-seeking forefathers. In a 1975 press release written as a plea for help in regaining the rights to the character he and Shuster created more than 35 years earlier, Siegel listed some of the current events of the time that had inspired him:

What led me into creating Superman in the early thirties? Listening to President Roosevelt’s fireside chats, being unemployed and worried during the depression, knowing homelessness and fear, hearing and reading of the oppression and slaughter of helpless oppressed Jews in Nazi Germany, and seeing movies depicting the horrors of privation suffered, I had the great urge to help the downtrodden masses, somehow. How could I help them when I could barely help myself? Superman was the answer.

And so, in the spring of 1938, in a then nameless city that would soon be known as Metropolis, sensational bulletins began pouring into the newsroom of the Daily Star (soon rechristened the Daily Planet):

211 COURT AVENUE, June 1938—Husband caught beating wife with belt thrashed within an inch of his life by man wearing tights and a cape. Husband faints after breaking knife blade against assailant’s chest. WASHINGTON, DC, June 1938—Senator Barrows and munitions magnate Emil Norvell conspire to embroil U.S. in European conflict. Confession given by lobbyist Alex Greer after he is taken on harrowing leap over tall building by costumed kidnapper. BLAKELY COAL MINE, August 1938—Worker miraculously rescued from collapsed shaft by unidentified Samaritan. Temporarily trapped by unexplained cave-in after denying hazardous conditions, owner Thornton Blakely vows “my mine will be the safest in the country and my workers the best treated.” COREYTOWN PRISON, March 1939—Superintendent Wyman indicted for cruelly starving, confining, and whipping inmates. Governor Bixby snatched out of bed by mystery-man and taken to witness atrocities firsthand. BATES MOTOR COMPANY, May 1939—Angry titan destroys factory for making unsafe cars. Mayor brought to city morgue and forced to view automobile fatalities allegedly caused by inadequate traffic laws.

Kryptonian karma

Superman dishes out some Kryptonian karma to (from top left) a wifer beater, corrupt lobbyist, unscrupulous mine owner, manufacturer of unsafe automobiles and a cruel prison warden.

These were the early adventures of Superman. Long before battling super villains like Lex Luthor and Brainiac, the Man of Steel made a name for himself as an extralegal dispenser of New Deal justice, unhindered by the restraints of either due process (when enforcing currently existing laws) or the democratic process (when punishing acts that were still legal). Stockbrokers, city contractors, the superintendent of an orphanage, a police commissioner, district attorney and a mayor were among those subjected to Superman’s righteous wrath. Possessing awesome strength, virtual invulnerability and the ultimate diplomatic immunity, whenever the Last Son of Krypton discovered one of his adopted homeworld’s many social inequities, he stepped in to correct it with superhuman speed. As the introduction to the 1940s radio show and cartoons starring Superman made clear, the Man of Steel‘s only concern was battling for “truth and justice.” The “American Way” was never mentioned. In Action Comics #8, Superman’s lack of allegiance to American tradition or law led to one of his most spectacular assaults on the status quo and clashes with official authority.

Breaking a young hoodlum out of a paddy wagon, Superman explains before setting him free, “It’s not entirely your fault that you’re delinquent–it’s these slums—your poor living conditions—if there was only some way I could remedy it.” Reading in the Daily Star about a Florida town being rebuilt after a devastating hurricane, Superman comes up with a plan that will make even bigger headlines.

METROPOLIS, January 1939—After first warning residents in this impoverished neighborhood to flee their homes, Superman brought down one dilapidated tenement building after another with his bare hands. Watching this one-man demolition crew shrug off a hail of gunfire and shrapnel, police, National Guardsmen, and an aerial bomber squadron realized too late that their attempts to stop him were only adding to the destruction. The entire block reduced to smoking rubble, this modern day Samson then fled the scene in a single bound. Shortly afterward, the government announced that it will replace the squalid slum houses with decent, low-rent housing for the poor.

Superman's war on poverty

Superman wages a one man war on poverty. Click on the links to read page 1, page 2 or page 3. 
 

Superman by Siegel and Shuster

A panel from Superman #1 reveals the Man of Steel’s true allegiance. Written by Jerry Siegel and drawn by Joe Shuster.

Whether the target of his wrath was a common thug, mad scientist or corrupt government official, Superman’s actions were less about who he was fighting than they were about who he was fighting for: “the oppressed” and “those in need.” This is why I think the world’s first superhero was fulfilling the role for which all superheroes are best suited and most needed. There are already institutions and real-life men and women dedicated to stopping common crime and apprehending those who commit it. Superheroes—like Robin Hood, the Scarlet Pimpernel and Zorro before them—are at their best, and most inspiring, when they’re acting as rebels with a cause bringing to justice the otherwise untouchable: the people who make the laws, or pay for those who do, and then ignore or abuse those laws for their own greedy and cruel purposes, with no one to hold them accountable.

Of course, a major barrier to superheroes routinely acting in this way is that some of those people also pay for advertising space in comic books.

Eventually, Superman’s corporate owners at National Periodical Publications (later DC Comics) asked Jerry Siegel to curb his creation’s habit of flying in the face of the legal authorities. In his 1980 essay “From Menace to Messiah,” comics historian Thomas Andrae reported:

Initially, the publishers were unaware that Siegel had cast Superman as an outlaw. When they discovered this fact inadvertently, Siegel was told to make Superman operate within the law and to confine his activities to fighting criminals. All controversial social issues were to be avoided.

At about the same time Siegel left to fight overseas in mid-1943, Superman was stricken with a case of super-selective amnesia erasing the last five years of his life. When one of his arch nemeses manages to copyright the English alphabet in that year’s May-June issue of Superman, the Man of Steel complains, “The Prankster has the law on his side, and I won’t flout justice at any cost.” Always a role model for the rest of the superhero community, once Superman declared “law” and “justice” synonymous, none of his associates seemed willing to argue with him.

Next, Part 4: All that glitters.

Posted in Activism, History, Superheroes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Comic Book Justice (Part 2)

Part two of my series on the history of comic book superheroes delves into their prehistory and what I consider the driving force behind their creation and primary motivation for their actions—at least initially.

Secret origins
Comic book scholars often refer to superhero stories as a “modern mythology.” It is true that superheroes and ancient gods share much in common. Some gods, such as Hercules and Thor, have even become superheroes. But there is a crucial difference between mythology and comic books. Unlike comic book writers, the chroniclers of Greek epics and Norse sagas believed they were recording history, not fantasy. In many ways, the tone and spirit of superhero stories, not to mention their place of birth, have more in common with American Tall Tales. No one who either told or listened to these yarns believed that the outlandish feats of Pecos Bill, Mike Fink, or Paul Bunyan actually took place, they just all silently agreed to pretend they did for the duration of the story. But because superhero tales have always been created as works of pure fiction intended to appear on the printed page, they are ultimately products of literature, and their original creators repeatedly mentioned the same three literary characters as primary sources of inspiration.

In an interview published in comics historian Thomas Andrae’s 2011 book, Creators of the Superheroes, Jerry Siegel named these characters while discussing the influences behind his and artist Joe Shuster’s creation of the very first superhero, Superman (more on him in Part 3):

 I loved The Mark of Zorro, and I’m sure that had some influence on me. I did also see The Scarlet Pimpernel but didn’t care much for it. . . . Of course, we loved Douglas Fairbanks as Robin Hood.

The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood

1883 edition of The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood

Robin Hood made his first literary appearance in Piers Plowman, written by William Langland in 1377, but it was Howard Pyle’s 1883 retelling, The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood, and film portrayals by Fairbanks (1922) and Errol Flynn (1938) that made him a household name (Flynn will always be my definitive Robin Hood). Though not exactly a superhero by today’s standards, this outlaw archer has been imitated by a long succession of bow-wielding comic book characters: in terms of both dress and personality, the Green Arrow is practically Robin’s clone (and his crime-fighting partner and lover, Black Canary, a more kick-ass version of Maid Marian). In addition, Sherwood Forest provided the model for hidden sanctums including the Batcave and the Fortress of Solitude, while groups such as the Avengers and the Justice League of America (JLA) are basically super-powered versions of the Merry Men.

Robin Hood-Green Arrow

Evolution of an archer. From left: 1938 movie poster for The Adventures of Robin Hood; panel from the 1987 comic miniseries Green Arrow: The Longbow Hunters, by Mike Grell; and 2011 painting of Green Arrow and Black Canary by Alex Ross.

The Scarlet Pimpernel

1905 edition of The Scarlet Pimpernel

Baroness Emmuska Orczy’s 1905 novel, The Scarlet Pimpernel (based on her 1903 play), has been adapted into several movies (Jerry Siegel would have seen the 1934 version, starring Leslie Howard and Merle Oberon), television series and a Broadway musical. The title character of the story took his pseudonym from an English wildflower. You might not expect botanical imagery to strike terror into the hearts of today’s criminals, but it has proven pretty effective for such comic book superwomen as Thorn, Nightshade, and the Black Orchid. The Scarlet Pimpernel’s band of compatriots was actually called a League (foreshadowing the JLA’s overseas branch, Justice League Europe), and his swift galley, The Day Dream, was a pre-industrial precursor to the Batboat and other customized crime-fighting vehicles. His mastery of disguise meant he had no need for a trademark costume, but his public persona of Sir Percy Blakeney did provide the Scarlet Pimpernel with one of the signature traits of a superhero: a misleadingly foppish secret identity.

All-Story Weekly

August 9, 1919 issue of All-Story Weekly

Johnston McCulley perfected the superhero prototype with Zorro, who made his first appearance in “The Curse of Capistrano,” published in the August 9, 1919 issue of All-Story Weekly. Zorro’s adventures have also been adapted several times for the big and small screens, with notable portrayals by Douglas Fairbanks (1920), Tyrone Power (1940), Guy Williams (1957-59), Frank Langella (1974) and Antonio Banderas (1998 and 2005). In his 1986 groundbreaking Batman epic, The Dark Knight Returns, Frank Miller established that it was Power’s 1940 The Mark of Zorro (my personal definitive version) that young Bruce Wayne had just seen with his parents on the night they were gunned down before his eyes. Mark of Zorro reveals how the seemingly dandyish Don Diego Vega first adopted the alter ego of this masked, black-garbed swashbuckler. The cunning Zorro, or “Fox” in English, also foreshadowed a long line of superheroes—from Batman to Spider-Man to Wolverine—who would take their names and powers (symbolic or physical) from animals.

Batman: The Dark Knight Returns

Panels from the 1986 Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, by Frank Miller.

Yet despite the superficial resemblances, Robin Hood, the Scarlet Pimpernel and Zorro were different from most of today’s costumed comic book do-gooders in one crucial respect. Their death-defying careers were devoted not to stopping crime, but to committing it.

Batman: Reign of Terror

In the 1998 Elseworlds graphic novel, Batman: Reign of Terror, the Dark Knight takes the place of the Scarlet Pimpernel, rescuing aristocrats from the guillotine.

The medieval version of “trickle down economics” that made Sir Robin of Locksley famous was literally highway robbery. In addition, while Robin Hood and his merry guerrillas were basically fighting a war against colonialism—Prince John was overtaxing the Saxon peasants whose land his invading Norman knights had conquered—they were still committing treason against their duly appointed ruler. During the Reign of Terror, English nobleman Sir Percy Blakeney repeatedly violated France’s sovereignty as the Scarlet Pimpernel by smuggling aristocratic enemies of the Republic out of the country before their blue blood could be spilled by Robespierre’s lethal paramour, Madame Guillotine. When Don Diego returned home to old Los Angeles in the early 1800s, after years spent in a Spanish military academy, he found the peons suffering under the exploitation of wealthy cabelleros and the tyranny of a despotic junta. Soon, Zorro began his own terrorist campaign, as McCulley put it, ”to avenge the helpless, to punish cruel politicians,” and “to aid the oppressed.”

Each of these original caped crusaders struck out against governments—not always their own—that preyed on their citizens. These idealistic rebels believed it was not only their right but also their duty to violate the law whenever it was necessary to preserve justice, even if it meant as drastic a measure as revolution. At the very least, these flamboyant agitators acted according to a duty once espoused by early 20th century activists and journalists to “comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.” Given his noble heritage, it makes sense that the first true superhero would feel the same way.

Next, Part 3: Faster than a speeding ballot.

Posted in Activism, History, Superheroes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Comic Book Justice (Part 1)

Today is the second anniversary of my first Comic Book Justice post, so it seems fitting to mark the occasion with a return to blogging after my four-month absence.

One of the things that has kept me otherwise occupied during the last few months was making preparations for a rather elaborate party (comic book-themed, of course) to celebrate my 50th birthday, which was in June. Thinking back on my first half century of life (I’m trying to be optimistic here), I can’t help but feel nostalgic about my earliest comic book reading days, and reflect on what comic book stories—particularly ones about superheroes—have meant to me during the more than 40 years that have elapsed since then.

That’s why I’m starting this series of posts on my personal view of the history of superhero comics and their reflection of our society’s ever-evolving sense of justice.

Crazy Al's Memorabilia Shop

My brother (left) and I outside Crazy Al’s Memorabilia Shop.

Childish things
On a winter’s day in 1976, my brother Steve and I walked down a staircase into an underground bazaar of antique dealers hidden beneath Prince George’s Plaza in Hyattsville, Maryland. Like a pair of young explorers venturing into an uncharted land of imagination, we discovered the wondrous realm of “Crazy Al’s Memorabilia Shop.” Scarcely able to believe our eyes, here was an entire store—only slightly bigger than a walk-in closet—entirely devoted to the sale of comic books. To us it was a musty treasure-trove of adventure, fantasy, horror and, as the name “comic book” would imply, even humor. But out of all the stories there were to choose from, nothing touched us so deeply or thrilled us so much as the action-packed tales of superheroes.

We dreamed of possessing their powers, their unfaltering confidence, their control over a world we couldn’t quite understand. They were our protectors, our wards against the forces of evil. When I was too afraid of my recurring nightmares to go to sleep, and too scared of the shapes lurking in the darkness of my room to lie awake in bed, I would close my eyes and silently recite an alphabetical list of superhero names until I passed safely into slumber.

But they were more than just protectors. They were teachers. And the lesson we learned from them was that justice conquers all. In their world the guilty were always punished, the innocent were always saved, and the righteous were always invincible. Gleefully dropping skyscrapers on super villains or hurling common thugs through plate glass windows, these “super cops” overpowered all those who threatened what was good and wholesome. Back then, the comics may have been in color, but morality was black and white.

Yet, as my appreciation for what is now more respectfully referred to as “graphic literature” has expanded over the years—along with my comic book collection—so has my definition of justice. I now see law and order, or at least blind obedience to them, as part of the problem rather than the solution. Today, there are a number of perfectly legal enterprises that could easily be seen as serious crimes: the rape of the environment; the theft of workers’ pensions; the extortion of citizens’ rights for promised homeland security. But when it comes to injustices like these, few superheroes show the same courage and determination to correct them as many of the real people who follow their fictional exploits. You would think that, given the hundreds of mild-mannered comic book citizens who regularly receive superpowers from alien gadgets, magic artifacts, and incredible scientific breakthroughs, by the sheer law of averages, the superhero bug would have bitten at least one fictional member of the NAACP, Greenpeace, National Organization of Women, the Human Rights Campaign, Amnesty International, or even the AFL-CIO. If their world were plagued by the same problems as our own, superheroes could act out very different power fantasies than the ones imagined by most adolescent comic book readers.

Wonder Woman could use her golden lasso of truth to expose the hypocritical, self-proclaimed guardians of morality who seek to deny her mortal sisters around the world their economic, political, social, and reproductive rights. Superman could use his nearly limitless powers to prevent unlawful acts of international military aggression committed by both Third World dictatorships and Free World democracies. Batman could use his unparalleled deductive skills and vast technological resources to bring to justice corporate criminal masterminds who profit at the expense of the environment, their workers’ safety, and the life savings of their investors and employees.

Wonder Womanon on abortionDespite these missed opportunities, I have not lost my nostalgic attachment to superheroes, just to their narrow focus on conventional crime. And as I learned more about the history of superhero comics, I discovered that, not only did the earliest caped crusaders once share my more expansive sense of justice, they were also descended from a literary lineage of costume-clad revolutionaries that was over six hundred years old.

Next, Comic Book Justice Part 2: Secret Origins.

Posted in Activism, History, Superheroes | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Anarchy unmasked

Tuesday, the FBI revealed the identity of Sabu, founder of the notorious computer hacking organization LulzSec. It turns out Hector Xavier Monsegur was tracked down last June through a carelessly uncloaked IP address, and has been working as an FBI informant ever since. Monsegur led authorities to five of his LulzSec partners, who are now facing charges of conspiracy to commit computer hacking. Monsegur formed LulzSec as a spin-off group from the computer “hacktivist” collective Anonymous, whose supporters/members live up to the name at Occupy movement protests and other demonstrations by wearing identical white-faced, black-Van Dyked masks. While the media is devoting all its attention on uncovering the details of Monsegur’s private life, I’m more interested in the face he and his alleged co-conspirators showed to the public.

Anonymous demonstrators

Anonymous demonstrators at Occupy Wall Street protest, Sept. 17, 2011.

Critical masses
The unofficial mask of Anonymous and the Occupy movement represents Guy Fawkes, a 17th century English folk-villain who took part in a 1605 conspiracy to blow up Parliament. The anniversary of Fawkes’ failure has since then been commemorated in the U.K. with fireworks and bonfires, onto which effigies wearing Guy Fawkes masks are tossed. This particular model mask was made famous by the title character of the 1982 graphic novel masterpiece, V for Vendetta, written by Alan Moore and illustrated by David Lloyd. The story is about an anarchist revolutionary attempting to single-handedly overthrow a fascist dictatorship that took power in Britain after a limited nuclear war obliterated most of the other first-world nations.

As Moore put it in a February 9 post on the BBC’s Web site, he began conceiving the plot of V for Vendetta during “a summer of anti-Thatcher riots across the UK coupled with a worrying surge from the far-right National Front.” Thirty years later, the goals of the Occupy movement are to end vast economic disparity, unchecked corporate greed and rampant financial fraud. Or as the movement’s tag line implies, to end the control of 99% of the world’s people, wealth and resources by the richest 1% of the population. The inspiration for the nationwide Occupy movement was the pro-democracy demonstrations that swept North Africa and the Middle East during last year’s Arab Spring uprisings. (Comic book coverage of recent acts of citizen unrest “from the Mid-East to the Mid-West” appears in the latest issue of the political anthology magazine, World War 3 Illustrated.)

As for the use of V’s Guy Fawkes mask by Anonymous and the Occupy movement, that was apparently inspired by the final scene in the film version of the graphic novel, where (spoiler alert) throngs of defiant citizens wearing the masks fill the streets. In the same BBC post, Moore expressed displeasure—though not surprise—that the movie removed any reference to the original work’s radical politics:

If there truly was government unease about the mask and its associations back in the 1980s, these concerns had evidently evaporated by the first decade of the 21st century, when the movie industry apparently decided to re-imagine the original narrative as some sort of parable about the post-9/11 rise of American neo-conservatives, in which the words “fascism” or “anarchy” were nowhere mentioned.

Moore doesn’t mean “anarchy” as a synonym for “chaos.” He’s referring to the political philosophy of anarchism that promotes a stateless society in which all forms of coercive authority are abolished. With that meaning in mind, he also shared why he thought the Guy Fawkes mask was eventually taken up—and put on—by today’s real-life anti-capitalist and anti-globalization activists:

It also seems that our character’s charismatic grin has provided a ready-made identity for these highly motivated protesters, one embodying resonances of anarchy, romance, and theatre that are clearly well-suited to contemporary activism, from Madrid’s Indignados to the Occupy Wall Street movement.

This was the second time Moore had publicly spoken out in defense of Occupy protesters. The first time was back in December of last year when he responded to a vicious verbal attack on them by another comics legend.

Clash of the titans
Frank Miller and Alan Moore are both credited with revolutionizing superhero storytelling in 1986 with the near simultaneous releases of what most consider to be their magnum opuses, Batman: The Dark Knight Returns and Watchmen, respectively. In Miller’s work since then on projects like Sin City and 300, many readers and critics have came to see disturbing endorsements of violent, misogynistic, and homophobic thought. His most recent graphic novel, Holy Terror, has largely been condemned as hackneyed, anti-Islamic hatemongering.

Frank Miller

Frank Miller

In a November 2011 statement titled “Anarchy” posted on his official Web site, Miller went on a hysterical tirade against members of the Occupy movement that laid to rest any questions about his personal political views at the same time that it raised some serious doubts about his grasp of reality.

“Occupy” is nothing but a pack of louts, thieves, and rapists, an unruly mob, fed by Woodstock-era nostalgia and putrid false righteousness. These clowns can do nothing but harm America.

“Occupy” is nothing short of a clumsy, poorly-expressed attempt at anarchy, to the extent that the “movement” – HAH! Some “movement”, except if the word “bowel” is attached – is anything more than an ugly fashion statement by a bunch of iPhone, iPad wielding spoiled brats who should stop getting in the way of working people and find jobs for themselves.

Alan Moore

Alan Moore

Alan Moore was asked to comment on Miller’s rant in a December interview with Honest Publishing. Better read and far more rational, Moore clarified, as he saw it, the anarchist-like philosophy behind the Occupy movement, which Miller’s paranoia sees as potentially society-ending chaos.

As far as I can see, the Occupy movement is just ordinary people reclaiming rights which should always have been theirs. I can’t think of any reason why as a population we should be expected to stand by and see a gross reduction in the living standards of ourselves and our kids, possibly for generations, when the people who have got us into this have been rewarded for it; they’ve certainly not been punished in any way because they’re too big to fail. I think that the Occupy movement is, in one sense, the public saying that they should be the ones to decide who’s too big to fail. It’s a completely justified howl of moral outrage and it seems to be handled in a very intelligent, non-violent way, which is probably another reason why Frank Miller would be less than pleased with it. I’m sure if it had been a bunch of young, sociopathic vigilantes with Batman make-up on their faces, he’d be more in favour of it. We would definitely have to agree to differ on that one.

I’d like to think most people would side with Moore on this.

Posted in Activism, Non Fiction, Personal heroism | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Taking credit (Part 3)

Full Series

Comic book writer Gary Friedrich isn’t as famous or acclaimed as Jack Kirby or Alan Moore, but his most well-known creation, Ghost Rider, has been the subject of two feature films. Unfortunately, it looks like Friedrich’s relative anonymity worked against him when he sued Marvel Comics for copyright infringement over the character, encouraging Marvel and parent company Disney to strike back at him in a way that it might not have against a more successful and popular creator.

Ghost in the machine
I still have the copy of Marvel Spotlight #5, in which Ghost Rider made his first appearance, that I bought in 1972 when I was 10 years old. It was one of the issues from my earliest years of reading comics that left a lasting impression on me. When I reread it in preparation for writing this post, I was surprised to see that the story was clearly credited as having been “conceived and written” by Gary Friedrich. I would have thought that would make settling the issue of creative ownership relatively easy, but it turns out to be a little more complicated than that.

Gary Friedrich

Gary Friedrich and the character he "conceived" for Marvel Comics, but the courts ruled he gave up for adoption.

Friedrich sued Marvel Comics for copyright infringement in 2007, coinciding with the release of the first Ghost Rider movie, which starred Nicolas Cage and grossed $228 million worldwide. Friedrich claimed that when Marvel failed to renew its original copyright on Ghost Rider when it expired in 2000, copyright reverted to him as the character’s creator. Marvel counter-sued Friedrich for damages from his sale of unlicensed Ghost Rider art and other merchandise at comic book conventions. Marvel claims that Friedrich a) co-created Ghost Rider with editor Roy Thomas and artist Mike Ploog; b) relinquished his rights to the character back in the 70s by cashing Marvel checks that were stamped on the back with an ownership-waving statement; and c) signed a 1978 agreement with Marvel granting it “forever all rights of any kind and nature” to the work he did for the company. Friedrich on the other hand claims full creative ownership of Ghost Rider—most compellingly corroborated by the credit Marvel itself bestowed exclusively on him in the character’s debut comic—and Friedrich’s lawyer maintains that the courts will eventually rule that he never transferred his renewal rights to the character. But that day has yet to come.

Shortly before the Feb. 17 release of the second Ghost Rider movie, Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (again starring Nicolas Cage), the courts ruled in Marvel’s favor, ordering that Friedrich repay the company the $17,000 he has made over the years selling Ghost Rider merchandise. He will still be allowed to claim the title of Ghost Rider creator, and sell his autograph, but can only sign it on officially licensed Marvel products that he has bought at retail price.

Marvel’s supporters—and even some of Friedrich’s—point out that the publisher was legally obligated to go after Friedrich or risk losing its copyright on Ghost Rider. This has been a longstanding policy of Marvel’s parent company, Disney, which incited public outrage in 1989 when it famously sued a daycare center  over unauthorized murals of Mickey Mouse and other Disney characters. Public reaction to Disney’s latest aggressive defense of its property has been similarly negative, given that Friedrich is 78 years old, in poor health, and makes his living trading on his relatively small claim to fame at comic book conventions across the country. Friedrich has vowed to keep fighting the good fight. To raise the $17,000 Friedrich now owes Marvel, supporters have set up donation sites, sold artwork and written an open letter to Nicolas Cage asking the Ghost Rider star and lifelong comic book fan to foot the bill himself. The call by fans to boycott Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance were apparently unnecessary given the film’s poor box office performance (personally, I would have found it more of a hardship if I were asked to support Friedrich by actually going to see the movie).

Comics artist Stephen Bissette‘s legal adviser and contract consultant Jean-Marc Lofficier maintains that because Marvel never had Friedrich sign anything waving his rights (as is common practice today) to royalties from “other media to be invented in the future,” the company was not authorized to sell Ghost Rider licensing rights for DVDs and video games—which didn’t exist in the 70s. This means Friedrich would be entitled to at least a share of Marvel’s profits from these media. Lofficier’s post on the case also warns that the precedent Marvel/Disney has set by suing a comics professional for selling art and other merchandise featuring a character he created—an industry-wide and traditionally tolerated practice—it’s “only a matter of time until Disney, now aware of the issue, sends one of their young attorneys with a stash of blank [cease and desist] letters at conventions and start handing them out to everyone selling Marvel sketches without authorization.” This would have a huge negative impact on the livelihoods of countless comics artists already cut off from any share in the company revenues generated by characters they created and helped make famous.

But does that make the abusive, exploitative and vindictive actions of Marvel, or DC Comics, somehow more objectionable than those of any other huge corporation protecting its profits at all costs?

I think it does.

These companies have built their considerable fortunes and multi-media empires on the iconic stature of characters dedicated to promoting ideals of truth and justice. It’s not the raw power or amazing abilities of characters like Superman, Captain America and Wonder Woman that inspired generations of devoted followers. It’s the values superheroes represent that have made them both treasured cultural idols and merchandising gold mines. After all, how many supervillains get their own movies, video games and children’s sleepwear?

Marvel and DC aren’t just creating escapist entertainment, they’re creating role models. As Alan Moore put it in Stephen Bissette’s 1993 book of interviews, Comic Book Rebels:

Superman had a code of morals that was expressed repeatedly and quite clearly. It wasn’t very sophisticated; it more or less amounted to, “Don’t lie. Don’t kill anybody. And always try to help other people out if they’re in trouble.” Which is naive and simple, but as a basic code of morality, it’ll do until you can grow up and shade in some of the more subtle areas. So that was true of me, and I think it was true for a lot of people in our generation; that we learned our morality from these simple, silly ass superhero books.

But judging from the way DC Comics has treated Alan Moore, not to mention the way it treated Superman’s creators, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, it might appear that the morality promoted by the publisher’s characters is nothing more than another gimmick used to sell comic books—like variant covers and holograms. Likewise, when it comes to crediting and compensating its creators according to their contributions, Marvel apparently considers itself exempt from the superhero code made famous by Stan Lee in the first appearance of Spider-Man (whose cover debut was drawn by Jack Kirby): “With great power there must also come great responsibility.”

That leaves it up to readers who actually believe in those “silly ass” values to let Marvel and DC know how we feel about their treatment of the writers and artists who helped teach them to us.

Because justice shouldn’t just be something you read about in comic books.

Posted in Creators' rights, Fiction, Superheroes | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments